Author: Dieter Steiger

  • E2E SAP Testing – Halfway Under Control?

    In many blogs, we have discussed the deficiencies in SAP testing. Changes to an existing system are the order of the day. Again and again, errors are corrected, customizing and programs must be adapted, new functions are rolled out. Also, technical changes as hot fixes and service packs must be installed, as well as upgrades. In view of the large number of changes, problems with testing is not want you really want. But most SAP customers have come to terms with it, solving retroactively the problems involved with rolling out badly or incompletely tested changes – amidst the applause of the business. This is quite an effort, but still considered a more sensible approach than testing the whole software system.

    Everyone will agree that this is not the approach we want. Fortunately, specialized consulting companies such as FocusFrame as well as manufacturers of testing software such as HP,  Panaya, IntelliCorp, IBIS and above all SAP have taken this to heart. However, we are still far from a real end-to-end (E2E) testing or quality process starting right from the business requirements level, but at least you can start a continuous E2E testing process covering all changes as soon as the transport of a SAP change request is due. And this is already a great benefit.

    What Does This Mean in Detail?

    SAP E2E testing process and tools

    • The first step is to analyze which SAP transactions and programs are affected by the change, on the basis of the changes due for transport and of the system or a model of it. This step is mostly referred to as Change Impact Testing. This task is supported by specialized products like HP Change Impact Testing (CIT) for SAP, SAP Test Automation and Optimization (SAP TAO) as well as IntelliCorp LiveCompare. An exciting alternative is Panaya Inc.´s pure SaaS solution. Using this service, the SAP user does not even have to install any software.
    • Once the involved transactions are known, it must be found out which testing scenarios are necessary. For this step, too, there is reasonable technical support now. As a result, the testing scenarios are identified and together with the underlying test script made available to the test management tool. This is accomplished by using SAP Test Automization and Optimization in combination with SAP Quality Center by HP.
    • In spite of above system support and test szenario reduction, the testing scenarios should – due to their large number – pass another filter. This step is widely referred to as Risk Based Testing. The point here is to reduce the number of tests to be executed to the really relevant ones. This step is supported by SAP TAO and, particularly, by SAP Quality Center by HP.
    • Then, the test management tool executes the filtered tests automatically. The results are evaluated and, if necessary, the defect management process is started and monitored. This task is assumed by SAP Quality Center by HP in combination with HP Quick Test Pro.

    From Transport Packet-to-End-Testing up to real E2E Testing
    All this sounds quite simple and logical. In practice, however, it is quite a challenge to set up and operate such an environment. As a methodologist, however, you will consider this „reactive“ approach still suboptimal as the above „E2E“ quality process, instead of starting from the beginning, meaning the requirements management, is initiated not before the changes have been executed and ready for transport. Information about the effects of changes is known to be useful on starting the projects from the project portfolio management, supporting the business analyst as well as the developers and the test team. SAP has become aware of this and is working on a solution using the new Business Process Change Analyzer (SAP BPCA) to enable real E2E quality management.

    Implementing SAP E2E testing correctly will change the poor SAP E2E quality mangement into a model for other commercial software solutions addressing quality management. The benefit of a consistent, comprehensive testing for SAP landscapes can hardly be overestimated. The reduced number of system breakdowns after the weekly roll-out of changes justifies the investment in this area – as every head of a SAP Competence Center will readily confirm. The somewhat less spectacular quality improvement along with the cost and risk reduction reached in the medium term, will provide a considerable profit by introducing a SAP E2E testing project in the context of an application lifecycle management initiative.

    🇩🇪 Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen

  • SAP Solution Manager – More Than Just SAP Marketing?

    As its name suggests, the SAP Solution Manager is designed to provide support for the management of SAP customer implementations. Does it perform this task? Or is it just one of SAP´s marketing instruments?

    Missing Functions for Complex System Landscapes
    When discussing the pros and cons of SAP Solution Manager, we must first of all give SAP credit for being one of the few vendors providing a solution management platform at all.

    But taking a closer look at the various components of SAP Solution Manager, what you see is rather some kind of patch work. It seems that many functions have been integrated just pro forma to comply with qualifications typically demanded by the market in RFPs (request for proposal)?

    Some of the  components, though existing, are only in parts or insufficiently integrated. In order to efficiently manage customer implementations, additional office solutions are needed. This, however, seems to be useful only for small-scale SAP implementations. More complex organizational structures or heterogenous SAP landscapes imply additional dependencies that prevent these solutions from answering the purpose.

    Unfortunately, in many SAP Solution Manager implementations the focus is not on what the customer actually requires, but on those functions offered by SAP Solution Manager by default.

    Expectation towards an Efficiently Working SAP Solution Management Platform
    Much of what we expect from a SAP solution management is comparable to what a comprehensive application lifecycle platform would offer. It is particularly important that the complete service lifecycle of the SAP implementation can be managed, including all documentary, organizational and technical interdependences, covering all phases from the generation of the first process implementations to extensions and error recovery, and up to process deactivation.

    Also, the complete cost and activity accounting (integrated financial management) should be made transparent all across the lifecycle of the solution. This is the only way to set up a cost-benefit equation for a customer implementation.

    The structure of the solution should provide subdivisions according to the Business Services (BS) it supports so that these services can be aligned with the overall goal of the enterprise. This results in an effective service portfolio management (SPM) and ensures the targeted value of the implementation. A working service portfolio management makes evident that in the context of a consistent service orientation, IT service management (ITSM) and project portfolio management (PPM) can no longer be regarded as isolated elements.

    In addition, advanced solution management applications should integrate consistency-ensuring measures directly into the processes in order to minimize risks. Wherever possible, automation should be favored, particularly for performing organizational tasks. This can be reached by digitization or coding.

    The following example clarifies above statement. Digitization prevents overtaker problems during transports (consistency-ensuring measures), because the transports are directly carried out (automation) upon release (organizational task).

    By the way: consistency-ensuring measures are particularly important for SAP customers using company templates when changes are transported: Applying Business Configuration Sets (BC Sets) or generally transporting SAP customizing changes can result in inconsistencies between templates and distributed implementations, because customizing of the involved systems can be changed at any time. Offering customizing synchronization and locking mechanisms, SAP Solution Manager provides a solution for this problem which unfortunately is not very well known.

    Summary
    It is crucial to success that the customer has a clear picture of all relevant IT processes involved in SAP solution management. This means that the focus must not be on the solution management tool, but on the risks that are addressed and minimized by Solution Manager. From this, we can directly derive the demands that should be placed on solution management.

    🇩🇪 Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen

  • OC Oerlikon – How SAP Roll-in Projects can Fail

    On Friday, October 26, 2007, inside-it.ch reported that OC Oerlikon will stop its super SAP project. The new approach is said to provide a „more intelligent, more flexible and cheaper solution that integrates all ERP systems of the business units using a central SAP consolidation tool“.

    This seems to simplify things, but why is it that SAP roll-in projects fail one after another? As a solution architect and interested oberserver of such projects, I dare to give some simple explanations:
    The originally pragmatic plan to technically avoid a number of varying ERP environments is in most cases not the primary goal. Often, the roll-in project is targeting to implement an operation with identical processes all across the enterprise and to benefit from best practices. Extremely challenging goals!

    Unfortunately, the project’s target organization and processes for the overall company often end up being insufficiently adjusted to SAP. In addition, the organizational and cultural complexity of such a original technical project requires that all quality assuring measures are clearly defined and strictly adhered to right from the beginning. Very often in such initiatives this is done much later, if at all.

    Of course, these are not the only things to be observed in order to ensure success of a SAP R/3 roll-in project or any other super project. But to begin with, every project manager is well advised to be alert to the stumbling blocks in SAP roll-in projects as described above.

    🇩🇪 Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen

  • HP BTO Software Centers – Overview

    HP offers a number of BTO Centers. These software packages support in the context of a BTO strategy specific phases of the application lifecycle. The following overview is meant to shed light on the HP BTO jungle.

    HP BTO Centers

    IT STRATEGY

    • Project and Portfolio Management Center (CIO Office)
      The IT management solution enables control and documentation of the enterprise processes, particularly with regard to an optimization of priorities, staff members and processes in IT organizations. For this purpose, modules for the management of portfolio, demand, time, changes, projects, resources, finances and programs are available. Upon coordination with business processes and enterprise requirements, the distribution and use of resources are optimized and processes are standardized (IT Governance).
    • SOA Center (CTO Office)
      The HP BTO solutions for governance, quality and management of service-oriented architectures (SOA) are designed to help customers to minimize economical risks in SOA project phases and to create a comprehensively controlled, business-oriented SOA basis. HP SOA Center enables registry/repository, policy management, consumer management, policy enforcement, performance monitoring und problem solving.

    APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT

    • Quality Center
      With HP Quality Center, a cross-enterprise exchange of information about test requirements, test planning, test execution and error reporting is possible, as well as checking for web security issues covering the entire testing and development team. Through functional test runs, GUI interfaces are automatically tested in applications and various release cycles.
    • Performance Center
      HP Performance Center features a real-time simulation of the maximum access demanded by customer requests using active virtual user input of the applications. This enables system optimization before „going live“ and ensures the desired steady availability. A required optimization can be controlled and accomplished under system load by help of an analysis program. Thus, new web or SAP applications are made secure before going into production.
    • Application Security Center
      By using the technologies of HP Applications Security Center, security gaps in web applications can be identified and judged all across the lifecycle: from development and quality control up to operation. Also applications that are already running in a productive system, can be checked for security gaps. In addition, audit and compliance requirements such as Sarbanes-Oxley, HIP AA or PCI can be met.

    (IT) OPERATIONS

    • HP Universal CMDB
      HP Universal CMDB is a configuration management database for IT organizations planning to implement business service management and ITIL-based initiatives. This software allows you to take up, document and store – in addition to physical configuration elements – logical elements. It also provides extended functionality such as an effects analysis and access control for building up and maintaining CMDB.

    Business Service Management

    • Business Availability Center
      This solution allows you to monitor the availability and performance of applications in operation for 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. Business processes, service levels, applications an the underlying infrastructure are coordinated to one another. The infrastructure is visualized by a graphical view with the traffic light set of colors red, orange and green showing the state of operation. A drill down is available for detailed view and error analysis. BAC is used to ensure the active operation of all business-relevant applications and to verify internal or external SLA agreements.
    • Operations Center
      This solution features a comprehensive, service-oriented access to IT management. Information is integrated and synchronized across management silos, IT and business are connected to one another. This distributed, scalable management solution which also includes security features allows you to monitor, control and record the status and performance of different IT environments, covering network, system, databases, applications, services and Internet.
    • Network Management Center
      This network management solution is considered a strategic and particularly important investment. In the last few years it has been established as an indispensible component of error and event management as well as visualization of network topologies. Network configuration, network events, application performance, and network analysis are the main areas involved.

    Service Automation

    • Data Center Automation Center
      Process automation in IT centers can be effectively supported by HP Data Center Automation Center allowing IT organizations to easily increase cost efficiency and to better meet quality and compliance requirements.
    • Client Automation Center
      More and more security risks, increasing availability requirements, and the rapidly growing number of mobile and remote staff members make it more difficult to effectively and efficiently manage client computers – a requirement, however, which every modern success-oriented enterprise should focus upon. HP Client Automation Center allows you to automate relevant IT processes across the lifecycle of the client computers, no matter where their physical locations are.

    IT Service Management

    • Service Management Center
      HP Service Manager is a comprehensive, fully integrated IT service desk solution targeted to reduce the time spent on problem solving. Thanks to ITIL-based best practice processes and a scalable, service-oriented architecture, consistent, integrated processes can be rolled out all across IT organizations. Event, problem, change, and release management processes can be automated. Service level management and catalog-based service requests are supported. All processes are coordinated by means of configuration management.
  • Business Technology Optimization (BTO)

    The New Role of IT
    For many years, all IT departments seem to have taken up the cause of cost reducing. This has changed. Business managers more and more consider IT a lever for boosting growth. Particularly, this means for IT departments to implement new business models and concepts as fast as possible.

    In most cases, IT departments are not prepared to cope with rapid changes. They utilize a major part of their capacity, sometimes 90 %, for routine work such as the operation of the data center. Very often, this means that no capacity is left for implementing the ideas and business processes the CEOs have in mind (source: Handelsblatt April 14, 2007).

    BTO Solutions
    Business Technology Optimization (BTO) solutions support enterprises in optimizing the business value created by IT. The goal is to consistently extend – by using suitable methods and tools – IT´s contribution in areas such as securing competitive advantages, increasing customer satisfaction and minimizing risks and costs.

    The combination of Business and IT perspectives may raise new questions as to the benefit, quality and reliability of an IT service.

    The focus should be on taking into account and improving the effects of IT on business results. The most important issues are: How flexible, fast and effectively do we want IT to react on enterprise decisions, corporate mergers and changed market situations? In which way do we want it to support the control of the product portfolio or the implementation of marketing strategies, and what should IT´s role of a communication platform for enterprise an customers be like?

    These requirements reach far beyond the conventional IT goals: Accounting for a number of bugfixes in development, reaching defined project milestones, or efficiently utilizing the helpdesk may be evidence of successful IT, but not necessarily of a successful business.

    BTO solutions are meant to support the enterprise with methods and tools to plan IT´s contribution to the business more accurately, to increase it efficiently, and to make it visible.

    By no means, BTO is just a project to be applied to one area of IT. Using BTO successfully means to consistently take into consideration the effects of business on IT operation, IT strategy, IT controlling, IT revision, IT process optimization and IT risk management, and, likewise, observe the influence of IT activities in these areas on business. To reach this goal, new methods and technologies must be introduced and efficiently applied.

    About the author:
    Klaus Otto is Sales Manager HP Software Commercial Accounts at HP Germany (Hewlett-Packard GmbH). This article only contains personal comments on the subject.

    🇩🇪 Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen

  • Project Roadmap: Quick Wins with Iterations

    My blog Scoping – A Guarantee for Success through Harmonized Expectations describes how to identify factors that are most relevant to the success of the project:

    • Expectations of all key roles are defined and synchronized from the start
    • The technical system architecture is designed
    • The functional requirements are defined
    • An implementation roadmap comprising project contents, required organizations and project procedure is set up

    Harmonized Expectations and Step-by-Step Implementation Targeted at Partial Success
    Experience has shown that defining and synchronizing expectations is of great importance. With regard to expectations, the project scope plays a major role. Unfortunately, project team members as well as clients often fail to define the project precisely enough, including a variety of options and features into the project. Limited time and budget available for a maximum content are part of everyday business. Teams are getting unfocussed and bogged down in details loosing sight oft the project target. The project clients get impatient, failures mute motivation, and the original business cases are questioned.

    It is well known that projects promise to be successful only if sub-goals are defined ensuring step-by-step success and continuously producing a visible benefit. This is particularly true for long-lasting projects. The main issue here is to focus on the most important and prioritized requirements and functions and adhere to their consistent implementation.

    Implementation Roadmap and Iterations
    One oft he main issues of the scoping phase is to generate a practice-oriented implementation roadmap. This includes clearly defined targeted project objects, a time schedule, and the organization implied. Experience has shown that dividing the project into several iterations with clearly defined targeted objects leads to business quick wins and to a successful completion of the project. To follow this strategy, the most relevant requirements and core functions are identified and implemented in iterations.

    The main goal is to provide constant benefit for the project client and the users as soon as possible. Quick wins are achieved by first implementing those functions which are most suitable to ensure the highest possible benefit. In further iterations, more functions are added to those successfully implied to finally integrate the solution step by step into further processes, methods, systems and organizations. At the same time, a consistent project management und project marketing support the roadmap implementation. Management, client, and users know at any time which functions are available to them, and when.

    Iterations Optimized by Quick Wins
    Dividing projects into several iterations provides decisive advantages. They vary depending on context and task, but in most cases, the following advantages are ensured:

    • System with core functionality which rather soon works efficiently
    • Systematic knowledge transfer to users and business by targeted training at the right time.
    • Quick benefit as a basis and guideline for further procedure
    • Early integration of business organization and building up support services
    • Optimistic attitude towards the project by successfully completing iterations and meeting the expectations
    • Flexibility in structuring the functional requirements and a manageable basis for Scope Change Management
    • Organziational changes are implemented step by step and associated with achieving success
    • Short feedback loops, „lessons learned“, can be implemented in the next iteration

    The Challenge of Implementing Iterations
    Very frequently, a rigid project procedure is set forth by large enterprises. In addition to document templates, this includes specified and standardized rules of phase acceptance. The project passes through several phases, comprising preliminary studies, rough and detailed concept, realization, implementation, and operation. A new phase can only be started, after the preceding phase has been completed. This approach is often contrary to the basic idea and the immense benefit achieved by an iterative procedure.

    It is true that dividing the project into several iterations results in quick wins. But if all iterations, i.e. new functions, are repeatedly forced to pass through all project phases from the preliminary studies to operation,  this necessarily implies disprofit by loss of time and additional effort. The great benefit is given away!

    It is quite important to find common solutions in collaboration with the responsible persons, for example, from the project management office (PMO) or from quality control. Experience has shown that it is recommendable to have the most prominent mile stones approved „officially“, whereas the individual iterations can be approved by project members and application of quality assurance measures. A step-by-step extension of this approach to include scoping and phase acceptance which is attuned to an iterative concept would be useful.

    beteo Iterations

    Summary
    The benefit of an iterative approach is enormously high. In the context of standardized and rigid project implementation, this can be quite a challenge. However, addressing it at an early stage, iterations can easily be integrated into the existing environment. In a further step, this concept can be extended to include scoping and phase acceptance particularly attuned to iterations.

    After harmonizing the expectations of all key roles and prioritizing the requirements, all functions should be divided into individual iterations according to their importance. This allows you to focus on the core features and the highest possible benefit. Systems are available to users at an early stage, providing efficiently working core functionality. There is a fast and well-structured knowledge transfer leaving more time for the organization to implement changes. Quickly and successfully completed iterations result in a sense of achievement and promote an affirmative attitude  towards the project.

    In addition, the iterative approach allows you to carry out faster feedback loops and more flexibility in planning further iterations. This ensures quick wins and step-by-step success of the project.

    🇩🇪 Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen

  • Forrester: HP is Number 1 for Functional Testing

    According to then most recent Forrester Wave Report dating July 8, 2008 on Functional Testing solutions HP clearly keeps on leading this market.

    Using 96 criteria Forrester evaluated 6 solutions and came to clear results:

    • HP continues leading the functional testing market since it acquired Mercury Interactive in 2006.
    • IBM has a very promising product roadmap and has expanded its support for packaged applications.
    • Borland Software and Compuware reinforced their position with their respective users – Borland for the more technical testers, Compuware fot the less technical.
    • Empirix‘ and Seapine Software’s offers are less-costly but also functionally less-capable mainly because of limited support for applications and technologies.

    Overall Forrester observed functional testing solutions not only keeping up with new technologies but also improving functionality for manual testing, test management and test automation.

    Forrester Research evaluated the the most recent available versions of the following functional testing offerings:

    🇩🇪 Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen

  • A Strategy is a Story

    As a reminder of what a strategy is and what it should provide:

    • It organizes and coordinates a variety of acts and decisions of one or more persons to a common goal,
    • it makes this in a deliberate contrast to other perhaps possible approaches, takes a conscious decision and risk.
    • Effectiveness is achieved not only with orientation, concentration and determination, but also by the “surprising” innovative difference in the competition.

    If a strategy works, it must be told as a thrilling story. The people involved with the company need to understand the strategy, reproduce it in theirs experiences and realize it in theirs actions.

    1. What decisions have to be made in the overall context and to implement in action? What is the difference before and after? How do I know when I’m the right track?
    2. What are the obstacles, risks, resistors, which must be overcome? What “adventure” must be dealt with? With what result?
    3. What is the key difference to the competitors? What is the pivotal point for success of the strategy? When exactly does the strategy come into reality?
    4. How does the strategy fit to our company, the characters and the temperaments of people, to our values and cultural patterns, which are available for the necessary decisions and actions?
    5. Is the designed suspense conducive and full with power? Is it overstraining or subchallenging for the development of company? Must there something be added?
    6. Is the story, which tells the strategy, in total  coherent and credible? The people involved can they identify? Which adapters still need to be supplemented?

    The narrative review of your strategy improves the effectiveness and power. Weaknesses can be found and the risk of miscarriage is reduced. And the strategy is processed for the systematic communication within the company.

    About the author:
    Dr. Michael Loebbert is Coach and Management Consultant and author of the montly publication “Change Management Short Cut“.

    🇩🇪 Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen

  • Project Scoping – Aligning Expectations

    Projects often fail to be successful due to diverging, badly aligned expectations
    Dozens of statistics seem to suggest that there are dozens of reasons why projects fail to be successful. However, a great deal of them are attributable to vaguely defined objectives, problems related to technical architecture and a lack of management support. These causes, in turn, are in most cases due to either too optimistic or diverging expectations of the parties involved. Very often, projects are initiated without having identified and documented expectations as well as requirements on the part of all expert and management key roles.

    Scoping: Efficient approach to defining project content
    This is where scoping comes into play. This approach is extremely helpful when it comes to describing the functional requirements, defining project content and an adequate proceeding, and designing the technical architecture. The scoping phase targets at mapping the relevant context, ideas, requirements and prerequisites of all parties involved in the project in a well-structured way, reaching an agreement upon the project scope and establishing the project guidelines. Fixing an order of priority and laying down a clear structure makes the demanded objects transparent, well-defined, and synchronises the expectations of all persons involved. Experience has shown that syntonized expectations are one of the most important factors to ensure the success of a project.

    Scoping Ansatz

    Scoping phase in practice
    Several steps are necessary to reach these goals. Most of them must be executed in close collaboration with the client. This includes:

    • Defining a common objective and selecting relevant persons for workshops and interviews
    • Informing or training the project team members in order to create a common basis
    • Recording of business-related and functional requirements, needs and ideas during workshops and interviews
    • Understanding the technical requirements and challenges, the system landscape, and the necessary integrations
    • Prioritization with regard to quick wins and a high payback
    • Attending to a common understanding and identifying the points where the project gains momentum
    • Elaborating a detailed implementation roadmap, including time management and organizational planning, split up in iterations optimized by quick wins
    • Presentation of the results to the management

    Implementation Roadmap
    One of the most significant results from the scoping phase is the roadmap for implementation. The roadmap includes not only project content and proceeding, but also a time schedule and organizational planning, and provides a basis for the project. It is recommended to split up the project scope into several implementation iterations in favor of a clearly structured step-by-step planning and in order to immediately provide maximum benefit to the project client.

    Core factor of success
    Principally, scoping should be a closely integrated part of the project methodology. If, for example, there are no interviews, this will cause lead to a sign of alarm at the quality gate. If necessary, this item must be re-worked – or there is a clear decision not to do so.
    Experience has shown that the choice of persons involved in the scoping phase is of great importance. The key roles might vary depending on the task and the context, but it is indispensable to involve the client, the top management, the users, and the experts as regards content and technical issues. As soon as the participants are selected, the core factor of success are their availability as well as competent scheduling. We also recommend to have two persons hold the interviews in order not to loose sight of important aspects and to ensure complete documentation.

    Summary
    Scoping is a good way of fine-tuning project ideas and analyze the approaches to solution finding. Preferably, the scoping phase is an integral part of the typical procedure of all projects. As all information is collected by relevant key roles, the required data can be accessed, translated into requirements, and given a defined level of priority. From this, the concrete implementation roadmap is derived. Thus, the project idea is clearly defined, and the project scope is fixed with consideration of processes, organization, systems, including required system integrations, and other dependent processes. All persons involved in the project have a common interest in and are focused on the same issues. Their expectations are synchronized. The momentum gained by this common basis is the most significant stimulus for all to make the project a success story.

    🇩🇪 Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen

  • Software Archeology – how to Successfully Change SAP Releases

    16th century. The eyes of an archeologist are scanning a field. He is asking himself where he should start digging. In his life, he still has a few years left. Which area would, from his experience, hold a chance for him to make a discovery? Then he notices a tree. For growing, it would need nutrients, so underneath there might be something. This is what he knows from experience.

    When he starts digging, he hits on a small house of a rather poor family. Disappointed, he gives up.
    200 years later, a larger excavation project is started. The settlement is found to be the most important source of information about ancient times.

    SAP
    Those who know me are acquainted with my writing style exposing my affinity to exaggerate. Let´s take a typical SAP project, a release upgrade, for example. Doesn´t differ that much from the story of the unlucky archeologist, I think. In the beginning, you often know little about a system. Everything seems to be underground. You are asking yourself how to address the release change, and on the basis of which information you might dare a prognosis. What will happen during the project? If you are lucky, the consultant experts have a fair knowledge of the system and the processes implemented on them. If not, the project will almost typically go beyond its scope on the two axes expenditure of time and budget planning. As some of the most important project phases, such as testing and training of the end user, are neglected in favour of the implementation phase, you will be faced with a quality problem. This, in turn, will have an impact on the third axis, the user acceptance.

    The way out
    Typical SAP projects, such as upgrades, are planned according to the waterfall principle. But one important step of this method is massively neglected: The requirements analysis, also known as gap analysis – in other words, the question, „How did SAP influence OUR particular standard?” If you want to comprehensively answer this simple question with reference to a SAP landscape, the only solution to the “problem” of such massive analysis is its automation.

    How can you access best quality and complete information in the shortest possible time?
    There are quite a number of vendors who offer analysis tools, from SAP Consulting via RBE up to IntelliCorp. Each of these tools focuses on a particular aspect and therefore has its individual potency.

    IntelliCorp´s Assessor Template for SAP Upgrades addresses the problem on a rather broad basis. The tool offers a variety of fully automated analysis workflows. Within a few days, three on average, it provides a wide range of material for use in the context of a detailed planning of the upgrade project. As a side-effect, the result provides a basis for the implementation team to operate on. Its high degree of flexibility makes it a tool which is suitable for all SAP applications, including commercial solutions, integration of third-party software or own namespaces in workbench.

    About the author: Fritz Mosonyi is senior consultant and division manager for SAP tools at beteo partner SPP Wien.

    🇩🇪 Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen